Genetic regulation of compound leaf
morphology

A
spontaneous pea mutant was discovered in the glasshouses at the John Innes
Centre in the 1960s (Figure 4). The mutant had many defects; flowers without
petals and stamens, leaves with too few leaflets and no tendrils. Instead of
the normal pinnate leaf architecture of pairs of leaflets and tendrils on a
rachis, each mutant leaf had just a single leaflet. The mutation was known
as unifoliata. It had been reported once before, when Gösta Eriksson
noticed an abnormal type growing in his field trials in
Sweden
(Eriksson, 1929. Erbkomplexe des Rotklees und der Erbsen. Zeitschrift für
Pflanzenzüchtung XIV: 445-475).
Both
examples of the mutation had been carefully stored in the
John Innes Germplasm
Collection and it was not until the late 1990s that they were
characterised as lesions in a gene encoding the transcription factor
LEAFY (Hofer et al., 1997, Current
Biology 7: 581-587).
It was
the similarity between unifoliata flowers, which lack petals and
stamens, and the flowers of an Arabidopsis mutant, leafy,
which also lack petals and stamens, that enabled us to identify
unifoliata. The Arabidopsis LEAFY gene had been cloned (Weigel
et al., 1992, Cell 69: 843-859), so it was possible to design
oligonucleotide primers based on the Arabidopsis gene sequence, that
would amplify the LEAFY gene from pea, by PCR (polymerase chain
reaction). We discovered that descendents of Eriksson’s mutant carried a
single nucleotide change in their LEAFY gene compared to normal
plants. Descendents of the mutant shown in the photograph (Figure 4) had a
large deletion in their LEAFY gene – most of the coding sequence was
missing. These defective genes encode defective proteins that fail to carry
out their normal cellular functions, resulting in the abnormal organ
development seen in the unifoliata mutants.
In
Arabidopsis flowers, the protein encoded by LEAFY normally
activates other transcription factors, which in turn orchestrate the genes
required for normal development of petals and stamens. This doesn’t happen
in the abnormal flowers of leafy mutants, nor presumably, in the
abnormal flowers of unifoliata mutants where the pea version (orthologue)
of LEAFY is defective.
The
unifoliata mutants suggested that UNIFOLIATA (= LEAFY) is
normally involved in another gene activation cascade in pea leaves, and this
process fails because the gene is defective in abnormal unifoliata
leaves (Figure 5).

Figure
5.
A
mutant unifoliata leaf (left) and a wild-type (normal) pea leaf
(right).
Papers from our lab are highlighted in
yellow.
|
Norwich Research Park,
Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
|
 |